netdev - Re: [E1000-devel] behaviour question for igb on nehalem box

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AD8F089.9010602@sauce.co.nz>
Date:	Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:15:37 +1300
From:	Richard Scobie <richard@...ce.co.nz>
To:	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
CC:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
	e1000-list <e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
	"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] behaviour question for igb on nehalem box

I'm have just put together a Nehalem system (1 x Xeon), 
2.6.30.8-64.fc11.x86_64, which has quad onboard 82576 and noticed during 
testing using just a single interface, that the RX queues on the other 3 
were receiving interrupts - observed in /proc/interrupts.

Is this normal behaviour?

Regards,

Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html