netdev - Re: [PATCH][RFC]: ingress socket filter by mark

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1255897680.4815.63.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>
Date:	Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:28:00 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Atis Elsts <atis@...rotik.com>,
	"Maciej Z.enczykowski" <zenczykowski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]: ingress socket filter by mark

On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 19:28 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> I vote for extending BPF, and not adding the price of a compare
> for each packet. Only users wanting mark filtering should pay the price.

To be honest it nagged me as well;->
So here's a basic patch stolen from a patch i just saw that you
posted;-> I still havent tested. Let me know if it looks reasonable...

cheers,
jamal

View attachment "filt-sock-m-2" of type "text/x-patch" (779 bytes)