[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ADC9DE2.5010308@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:12:02 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@...il.com>
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
paulus@...ba.org, mostrows@...thlink.net
Subject: Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with
"alive" pppoe interfaces
Michal Ostrowski a écrit :
> Here's a bigger patch that just gets rid of flush_lock altogether.
>
> We were seeing oopses due to net namespaces going away while we were using
> them, which turns out is simply due to the fact that pppoew wasn't claiming ref
> counts properly.
>
> Fixing this requires that adding and removing entries to the per-net hash-table
> requires incrementing and decrementing the ref count. This also allows us to
> get rid of the flush_lock since we can now depend on the existence of
> "pn->hash_lock".
>
> We also have to be careful when flushing devices that removal of a hash table
> entry may bring the net namespace refcount to 0.
>
Your patch is mangled (tabulation -> white spaces),
and I dont believe namespace refcount can reach 0 inside pppoe_flush_dev(),
it would be a bug from core network code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists