[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ADCC58B.2060408@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:01:15 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
CC: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is missing counter update
Julian Anastasov a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> I really like this, but please define helper functions out of do_tcp_setsockopt()
>>
>> /* Translate value in seconds to number of SYN-ACK retransmits */
>> static u8 secs_to_retrans(int seconds)
>> {
>> u8 res = 0;
>>
>> if (seconds > 0) {
>> int timeout = TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT / HZ;
>> int period = timeout;
>>
>> res = 1;
>> while (res < 255 && seconds > period) {
>> res++;
>> timeout <<= 1;
>> if (timeout > TCP_RTO_MAX / HZ)
>> timeout = TCP_RTO_MAX / HZ;
>> period += timeout;
>> }
>> }
>> return res;
>> }
>>
>> You also need the reverse function for getsockopt()...
>
> Yes, I forgot that. Here is what I tested, should
> I split it later to 2 patches? May be it should go somewhere
> in net/core/sock.c as extern funcs with EXPORT_SYMBOL to
> allow other protocols one day to use it?
>
No need to EXPORT_SYMBOL it for the moment. We can add it later if really needed.
David, I think we should revert 6d01a026b7d3009a418326bdcf313503a314f1ea
(tcp: fix tcp_defer_accept to consider the timeout)
since we know its broken.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists