| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e6d1cecd0910191422t2905d9bbl3355fc50cf36ff90@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:22:39 -0500
From: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@...il.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@...p.net.lb>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
paulus@...ba.org, mostrows@...thlink.net
Subject: Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with
"alive" pppoe interfaces
I'm assuming that there was a race in us sending patches at nearly the same time
I'm convinced now that the flush_lock can die, and the patch I sent
out kills it.
If we were to have to have a global lock, you might as well just use
the flush_lock for everything.
Note that there's a bunch of checks for sk->sk_state vs
PPPOX_CONNECTED. PPPOX_CONNECTED being set implies that po->pppoe_dev
is valid. So, by ensuring that checks of sk->sk_state and
po->pppoe_dev are done under the protection of
lock_sock()/release_sock() it is not even necessary to check
po->pppoe_dev==NULL.
In fact, the NULL checks you're adding are equivalent to testing
sk->sk_state vs PPPOX_CONNECTED, and thus you're replacing the
synchronization provided by the socket lock with flush_lock.
--
Michal Ostrowski
mostrows@...il.com
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> [Eric Dumazet - Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 08:44:52PM +0200]
> ...
> |
> | There is still a race here, since you do a dev_put(po->ppoe_dev); without any lock held
> |
> | So pppoe_flush_dev() can run concurently and dev_put(po->ppoe_dev) at same time.
> |
> | In fact pppoe_flush_dev() can change po->ppoe_dev anytime, so you should check
> | all occurences of po->ppoe_dev use in the code and check if appropriate locking is done.
> |
> | pppoe_rcv_core() is not safe
> | pppoe_ioctl() is not safe
> | pppoe_sendmsg() is not safe
> | __pppoe_xmit() is not safe
> |
>
> Eric, Michal, please take a look (compile-test only).
> There is still unclear moment for NETDEV_CHANGEMTU
> since one could be doing this in say endless loop from
> userspace calling device to flush all the time which
> implies dev_put as a result :(
>
> Comments are welcome (and complains as well). I'll be able to
> continue handling (or reply to mail) tomorrow evening only.
> Anyway -- this patch is ugly enough but may happen to work.
>
> -- Cyrill
> ---
> drivers/net/pppoe.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.git/drivers/net/pppoe.c
> =====================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/drivers/net/pppoe.c
> +++ linux-2.6.git/drivers/net/pppoe.c
> @@ -386,14 +386,19 @@ static struct notifier_block pppoe_notif
> static int pppoe_rcv_core(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct pppox_sock *po = pppox_sk(sk);
> - struct pppox_sock *relay_po;
> + struct pppox_sock *relay_po = NULL;
> + struct net *net = NULL;
>
> if (sk->sk_state & PPPOX_BOUND) {
> ppp_input(&po->chan, skb);
> } else if (sk->sk_state & PPPOX_RELAY) {
> - relay_po = get_item_by_addr(dev_net(po->pppoe_dev),
> - &po->pppoe_relay);
> - if (relay_po == NULL)
> + spin_lock(&flush_lock);
> + if (po->pppoe_dev)
> + net = dev_net(po->pppoe_dev);
> + spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
> + if (net)
> + relay_po = get_item_by_addr(net, &po->pppoe_relay);
> + if (!net || !relay_po)
> goto abort_kfree;
>
> if ((sk_pppox(relay_po)->sk_state & PPPOX_CONNECTED) == 0)
> @@ -652,12 +657,15 @@ static int pppoe_connect(struct socket *
> /* Delete the old binding */
> if (stage_session(po->pppoe_pa.sid)) {
> pppox_unbind_sock(sk);
> + spin_lock(&flush_lock);
> if (po->pppoe_dev) {
> pn = pppoe_pernet(dev_net(po->pppoe_dev));
> delete_item(pn, po->pppoe_pa.sid,
> po->pppoe_pa.remote, po->pppoe_ifindex);
> dev_put(po->pppoe_dev);
> + po->pppoe_dev = NULL;
> }
> + spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
> memset(sk_pppox(po) + 1, 0,
> sizeof(struct pppox_sock) - sizeof(struct sock));
> sk->sk_state = PPPOX_NONE;
> @@ -670,7 +678,9 @@ static int pppoe_connect(struct socket *
> if (!dev)
> goto end;
>
> + spin_lock(&flush_lock);
> po->pppoe_dev = dev;
> + spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
> po->pppoe_ifindex = dev->ifindex;
> pn = pppoe_pernet(dev_net(dev));
> write_lock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
> @@ -708,10 +718,12 @@ end:
> release_sock(sk);
> return error;
> err_put:
> + spin_lock(&flush_lock);
> if (po->pppoe_dev) {
> dev_put(po->pppoe_dev);
> po->pppoe_dev = NULL;
> }
> + spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
> goto end;
> }
>
> @@ -738,6 +750,7 @@ static int pppoe_ioctl(struct socket *so
> {
> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> struct pppox_sock *po = pppox_sk(sk);
> + unsigned int mtu = 0;
> int val;
> int err;
>
> @@ -746,11 +759,19 @@ static int pppoe_ioctl(struct socket *so
> err = -ENXIO;
> if (!(sk->sk_state & PPPOX_CONNECTED))
> break;
> -
> + err = -EBUSY;
> + if (!spin_trylock(&flush_lock))
> + break;
> + err = -ENODEV;
> + if (po->pppoe_dev) {
> + mtu = po->pppoe_dev->mtu;
> + err = 0;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
> + if (err)
> + break;
> err = -EFAULT;
> - if (put_user(po->pppoe_dev->mtu -
> - sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr) -
> - PPP_HDRLEN,
> + if (put_user(mtu - sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr) - PPP_HDRLEN,
> (int __user *)arg))
> break;
> err = 0;
> @@ -760,14 +781,22 @@ static int pppoe_ioctl(struct socket *so
> err = -ENXIO;
> if (!(sk->sk_state & PPPOX_CONNECTED))
> break;
> -
> + err = -EBUSY;
> + if (!spin_trylock(&flush_lock))
> + break;
> + err = -ENODEV;
> + if (po->pppoe_dev) {
> + mtu = po->pppoe_dev->mtu;
> + err = 0;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
> + if (err)
> + break;
> err = -EFAULT;
> if (get_user(val, (int __user *)arg))
> break;
>
> - if (val < (po->pppoe_dev->mtu
> - - sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr)
> - - PPP_HDRLEN))
> + if (val < (mtu - sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr) - PPP_HDRLEN))
> err = 0;
> else
> err = -EINVAL;
> @@ -842,7 +871,7 @@ static int pppoe_sendmsg(struct kiocb *i
> int error;
> struct pppoe_hdr hdr;
> struct pppoe_hdr *ph;
> - struct net_device *dev;
> + struct net_device *dev = NULL;
> char *start;
>
> lock_sock(sk);
> @@ -856,7 +885,15 @@ static int pppoe_sendmsg(struct kiocb *i
> hdr.code = 0;
> hdr.sid = po->num;
>
> + spin_lock(&flush_lock);
> dev = po->pppoe_dev;
> + if (!dev) {
> + spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
> + error = -ENODEV;
> + goto end;
> + }
> + dev_hold(dev);
> + spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
>
> error = -EMSGSIZE;
> if (total_len > (dev->mtu + dev->hard_header_len))
> @@ -899,6 +936,8 @@ static int pppoe_sendmsg(struct kiocb *i
> dev_queue_xmit(skb);
>
> end:
> + if (dev)
> + dev_put(dev);
> release_sock(sk);
> return error;
> }
> @@ -911,15 +950,19 @@ end:
> static int __pppoe_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct pppox_sock *po = pppox_sk(sk);
> - struct net_device *dev = po->pppoe_dev;
> + struct net_device *dev;
> struct pppoe_hdr *ph;
> int data_len = skb->len;
>
> if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD) || !(sk->sk_state & PPPOX_CONNECTED))
> goto abort;
>
> - if (!dev)
> - goto abort;
> + spin_lock(&flush_lock);
> + if (!po->pppoe_dev)
> + goto abort_unlock;
> + dev = po->pppoe_dev;
> + dev_hold(dev);
> + spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
>
> /* Copy the data if there is no space for the header or if it's
> * read-only.
> @@ -942,11 +985,13 @@ static int __pppoe_xmit(struct sock *sk,
>
> dev_hard_header(skb, dev, ETH_P_PPP_SES,
> po->pppoe_pa.remote, NULL, data_len);
> -
> dev_queue_xmit(skb);
> + dev_put(dev);
>
> return 1;
>
> +abort_unlock:
> + spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
> abort:
> kfree_skb(skb);
> return 1;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists