netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] Per route TCP options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:53:24 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...efidence.com>
cc:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, ori@...sleep.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Per route TCP options

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:

> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> > Gilad Ben-Yossef a écrit :
> >   
> > > Turn the global sysctls allowing disabling of TCP SACK, DSCAK,
> > > time stamp and window scale into per route entry feature options,
> > > laying the ground to future removal of the relevant global sysctls.
> > >
> > > ...
> > Interesting... But you should give numbers to your patches so that we know
> > their order
> >   
> Will do.
> > You could also do the ECN part for consistency (ie RTAX_FEATURE_ECN ->
> > RTAX_FEATURE_NO_ECN)
> >   
> That and  sysctl_tcp_mtu_probing are on my todo list, assuming the general
> direction is accepted, of course.
> 
> Specifically, I couldn't understand why sysctl_tcp_ecn is documented to be a
> boolean value, but is initialized to 2 and queried with if (sysctl_tcp_ecn ==
> 1) so I decided to let it be until I figure it out... ;-)

Ah, I didn't notice that "- BOOLEAN" there so I modified only the 
description (some blindness to caps perhaps :-)), did you perhaps read
it fully?

-- 
 i.