[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091020140632.79efb738@s6510>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:06:32 +0900
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: Introduce dev_get_by_index_rcu()
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:03:44 +0200
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> David Miller a écrit :
> > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:23:54 +0200
> >
> >> I wonder if the whole thing could use RCU somehow, since some
> >> workloads hit this dev_base_lock rwlock pretty hard...
> >
> > True, but for now we'll put your fix in :-)
>
> [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: Introduce dev_get_by_index_rcu()
>
> Some workloads hit dev_base_lock rwlock pretty hard.
> We can use RCU lookups to avoid touching this rwlock.
>
> netdevices are already freed after a RCU grace period, so this patch
> adds no penalty at device dismantle time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
All usage dev_base_lock should be replaceable by using combination of rtnl_mutex
and RCU?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists