[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF1BCE4CF8.BD48A587-ON65257655.0024B1CD-65257655.0025CC6C@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:22:51 +0530
From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: build test your changes!
Hi Dave,
Sorry about the build failure. I did do a build and a stress test. But
I missed changing the name sk_record_tx_queue() in both sock.h
and dev.c when testing. I caught the miss before sending the patch,
but changed the name only in sock.h, and didn't do a final build
again. Sorry about this, will not assume next time.
I will fix this (including patch order) and resend after build and test.
Thanks,
- KK
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote on 10/20/2009 11:52:04 AM:
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> 10/20/2009 11:52 AM
>
> To
>
> Krishna Kumar2/India/IBM@...IN
>
> cc
>
> netdev@...r.kernel.org
>
> Subject
>
> build test your changes!
>
>
> Krishna, you add:
>
> +static inline void sk_tx_queue_set(struct sock *sk, int tx_queue)
> ...
> +static inline void sk_tx_queue_clear(struct sock *sk)
> ...
> +static inline int sk_tx_queue_get(const struct sock *sk)
> ...
> +static inline bool sk_tx_queue_recorded(const struct sock *sk)
>
> But then in the net/core/dev.c patch you go:
>
> + if (sk && sk->sk_dst_cache)
> + sk_record_tx_queue(sk, queue_index);
>
> I cannot see how you did a build test of this, it's absolutely
impossible.
>
> I'm reverting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists