netdev - RE: [PATCH v0 1/7] gianfar: Add per queue structure support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9F4C7D19E8361D4C94921B95BE08B81B8940F9@zin33exm22.fsl.freescale.net>
Date:	Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:57:57 +0530
From:	"Kumar Gopalpet-B05799" <Sandeep.Kumar@...escale.com>
To:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v0 1/7] gianfar: Add per queue structure support

Hi David,

Will respin them and send again.

-Thanks
Sandeep 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net] 
>Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 1:27 PM
>To: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
>Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 1/7] gianfar: Add per queue structure support
>
>From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
>
>> From: "Kumar Gopalpet-B05799" <Sandeep.Kumar@...escale.com>
>> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:15:14 +0530
>> 
>>> I am assuming all the 7 patches are applied.
>> 
>> I am going to add them, yes.
>
>Nevermind, these patches don't apply to net-next-2.6 at all 
>and will need to be respun.
>
>For example, patch #1 rejects because gfar_suspend() in
>net-next-2.6 takes a 'dev' not an 'ofdev'.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html