[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ADDAEA6.2040903@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:35:50 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ifb: should not use __dev_get_by_index() without locks
David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:23:54 +0200
>
>> I wonder if the whole thing could use RCU somehow, since some
>> workloads hit this dev_base_lock rwlock pretty hard...
>
> True, but for now we'll put your fix in :-)
Here is another vulnerable point, needing following patch.
Thanks
[PATCH] ifb: should not use __dev_get_by_index() without locks
At this point (ri_tasklet()), RTNL or dev_base_lock are not held,
we must use dev_get_by_index() instead of __dev_get_by_index()
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/ifb.c b/drivers/net/ifb.c
index 801f088..030913f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ifb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ifb.c
@@ -98,12 +98,13 @@ static void ri_tasklet(unsigned long dev)
stats->tx_packets++;
stats->tx_bytes +=skb->len;
- skb->dev = __dev_get_by_index(&init_net, skb->iif);
+ skb->dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, skb->iif);
if (!skb->dev) {
dev_kfree_skb(skb);
stats->tx_dropped++;
break;
}
+ dev_put(skb->dev);
skb->iif = _dev->ifindex;
if (from & AT_EGRESS) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists