[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ADEC312.7090609@codefidence.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:15:14 +0200
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...efidence.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, ori@...sleep.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Per route TCP options
Hi Ilpo,
Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>
>> Specifically, I couldn't understand why sysctl_tcp_ecn is documented to be a
>> boolean value, but is initialized to 2 and queried with if (sysctl_tcp_ecn ==
>> 1) so I decided to let it be until I figure it out... ;-)
>>
>
> Ah, I didn't notice that "- BOOLEAN" there so I modified only the
> description (some blindness to caps perhaps :-)), did you perhaps read
> it fully?
>
>
Yes, I did finally. What threw me off was that that
TCP_ECN_create_request() were the value if checked as a boolean was
inlined in the include file. I've missed that. Thanks for the tip.
At any rate, it means that "noecn" is not a good route option feature,
since it is not boolean. I plan to handle those in the next patch set,
if the current one is accepted.
Thanks,
Gilad
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker & CTO
Codefidence Ltd.
Web: http://codefidence.com
Cell: +972-52-8260388
Skype: gilad_codefidence
Tel: +972-8-9316883 ext. 201
Fax: +972-8-9316884
Email: gilad@...efidence.com
Check out our Open Source technology and training blog - http://tuxology.net
"Sorry cannot parse this, its too long to be true :)"
-- Eric Dumazet on netdev mailing list
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists