netdev - Re: Policy routing + route "via" gives a strange behavior

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9041a1390910210147v57b04afg5c0ac320b87eafd2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:47:08 +0100
From:	Mallika Gautam <mallika.gautam@...il.com>
To:	Guido Trotter <ultrotter@...qua.net>
Cc:	Atis Elsts <atis@...rotik.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Policy routing + route "via" gives a strange behavior

>
>> Anyway, you can achieve what you wish by using the "onlink" option, e.g.:
>>   ip route add table 100 default dev eth1 via 192.168.5.254 onlink
>

Hi,
I am facing exactly the same issue and have to flush the main table
once the routes in the table get added. This is really nasty as I need
to this from a kernel module every time an interface is shutdown and
again brought up.

"onlink" doesn't seem to work as it "sees" the destination IP address
"onlink" instead of resolving it via the gateway. E.g. if I want to
ping 139.85.111.12 via eth1, it tries to send ARP request for
139.85.111.12  and not 192.168.5.254. So it doesn' work.

I would really link to see this behaviour fixed as the workarounds are
equally painful.

Regards
Mallika
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html