netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4] [RFC] Add c/r support for connected INET sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87ws2oei7i.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:05:05 -0700
From:	Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	containers@...ts.osdl.org, John Dykstra <jdykstra72@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] [RFC] Add c/r support for connected INET sockets

SH> Sorry, I think we've discussed this before but can't recall - does
SH> setting sport here allow an unpriv user to bypass
SH> CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE?

Yes, it does.  I was kinda considering that part of the input sanity
checking that I officially punted on.  However, as far as I know,
we'll just need to check that capability before we bind() in the
listen/closed case and hash in the connected case.

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html