[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091023064552.6ca3cbd8@s6510>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:45:52 +0900
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
gospo@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/3] ixgbe: Set MSI-X vectors to
NOBALANCING and set affinity
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:22:36 -0700
>
> > The first thing any performance guide says is to disable irqbalance
>
> Such guides are wrong, and that's the end of this discussion.
>
> These kinds of guides also say to do all kinds of crazy things with
> the socket sysctl settings. That's wrong too and we absolutely do not
> do things to accomodate nor support those guide suggestions.
>
> And we won't do that here.
>
> I'm especially not going to succumb in this case because Arjan has
> been more than responsive to making sure irqbalanced in userspace does
> the right thing for networking devices, even multiqueue ones.
>
> So we can make it do the right thing when flow director is present.
> In fact, the thing you want for flow director makes sense in the
> general case too.
irqbalance daemon already has IRQBALANCE_BANNED_INTERRUPTS
to work around this. It also has code to special case devices, if you
think ixgbe needs special treatment, why not do it there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists