[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AE1A37F.8010203@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:37:19 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jasper Spaans <spaans@...-it.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modify bonding hash transmit policies to use the packet's
source MAC address
Jasper Spaans a écrit :
> Modify bonding hash transmit policies to use the psource MAC address of
> the packet instead of the MAC address configured for the bonding device.
>
> The old sitation conflicts with the documentation.
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 69c5b15..b140b52 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -3668,7 +3668,7 @@ static int bond_xmit_hash_policy_l23(struct sk_buff *skb,
> (data->h_dest[5] ^ bond_dev->dev_addr[5])) % count;
You forgot one bond_dev->dev_addr[5] occurrence here
> }
>
> - return (data->h_dest[5] ^ bond_dev->dev_addr[5]) % count;
> + return (data->h_dest[5] ^ data->h_source[5]) % count;
> }
Could you check if bond->xmit_hash_policy(skb, bond_dev, bond->slave_cnt);
could be replaced by bond->xmit_hash_policy(skb, bond->slave_cnt),
now that various implementations dont need bond_dev anymore ?
static int bond_xmit_hash_policy_l23(struct sk_buff *skb, int count) ...
Dont forget your "Signed-off-by: Jasper Spaans <spaans@...-it.com>",
copied to "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> and "Jay Vosburgh" <fubar@...ibm.com>
(respectively network and bonding maintainers)
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists