[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091027142426.GB3141@kvack.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:24:26 -0400
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...et.ca>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fib_hash: improve route deletion scaling on interface drop with lots of interfaces
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 05:17:49PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > bottleneck. Next up in the network code is rt_cache_flush(). Comments?
>
> On a real router adding and removing routes is happening a lot
> whereas interface changes are rare. You're making a more common
> operation more expensive for the sake of a less common one.
It's not a question of more common vs less common, but if the system can
recover from an adverse event within a reasonable amount of time. Tunnel
flaps occur in the real world, and this results in the change of state of
a large number of interfaces at the same time. Would it be okay if this
is wrapped in a config option? I agree that the extra overhead is not
for everyone.
> Please put local variable lines that are longer at the beginning of
> the list of variable declarations at the top of a function, not the
> other way around which stands out like a sore thumb and looks ugly.
Whoops, will fix.
-ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists