[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091027150436.56e673cd@nehalam>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:04:36 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
opurdila@...acom.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH] net: fold network name hash (v2)
The full_name_hash does not produce a value that is evenly distributed
over the lower 8 bits. This causes name hash to be unbalanced with large
number of names. There is a standard function to fold in upper bits
so use that.
This is independent of possible improvements to full_name_hash()
in future.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
--- a/net/core/dev.c 2009-10-27 14:54:21.922563076 -0700
+++ b/net/core/dev.c 2009-10-27 15:04:16.733813459 -0700
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
#include <linux/socket.h>
#include <linux/sockios.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/hash.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/if_ether.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
@@ -199,7 +200,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_base_lock);
static inline struct hlist_head *dev_name_hash(struct net *net, const char *name)
{
unsigned hash = full_name_hash(name, strnlen(name, IFNAMSIZ));
- return &net->dev_name_head[hash & ((1 << NETDEV_HASHBITS) - 1)];
+ return &net->dev_name_head[hash_long(hash, NETDEV_HASHBITS)];
}
static inline struct hlist_head *dev_index_hash(struct net *net, int ifindex)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists