netdev - Re: [PATCH] Multicast packet reassembly can fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AE81A70.5060307@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:18:24 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Steve Chen <schen@...sta.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Multicast packet reassembly can fail

Steve Chen a écrit :
> Multicast packet reassembly can fail
> 
> When multicast connections with multiple fragments are received by the same
> node from more than one Ethernet ports, race condition between fragments
> from each Ethernet port can cause fragment reassembly to fail leading to
> packet drop.  This is because packets from each Ethernet port appears identical
> to the the code that reassembles the Ethernet packet.
> 
> The solution is evaluate the Ethernet interface number in addition to all other
> parameters so that every packet can be uniquely identified.  The existing
> iif field in struct ipq is now used to generate the hash key, and iif is also
> used for comparison in case of hash collision.
> 
> Please note that q->saddr ^ (q->iif << 5) is now being passed into
> ipqhashfn to generate the hash key.  This is borrowed from the routing
> code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@...sta.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Huth <mhuth@...sta.com>
> 

This makes no sense to me, but I need to check the code.

How interface could matter in IP defragmentation ?
And why multicast is part of the equation ?

If defrag fails, this must be for other reason,
and probably needs another fix.

Check line 219 of net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c

#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
        /* With SMP race we have to recheck hash table, because
         * such entry could be created on other cpu, while we
         * promoted read lock to write lock.
         */
        hlist_for_each_entry(qp, n, &f->hash[hash], list) {
                if (qp->net == nf && f->match(qp, arg)) {
                        atomic_inc(&qp->refcnt);
                        write_unlock(&f->lock);
                        qp_in->last_in |= INET_FRAG_COMPLETE;   <<< HERE >>>
                        inet_frag_put(qp_in, f);
                        return qp;
                }
        }
#endif

I really wonder why we set INET_FRAG_COMPLETE here
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html