[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091029165556.GA9846@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:55:56 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@...l.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
dann frazier <dannf@...com>, linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org,
Narendra_K@...l.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jordan_Hargrave@...l.com, Charles_Rose@...l.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udev: create empty regular files to represent net
interfaces
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 04:49:35PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3. Name assignment mechanism
> Disks: kernel suggests a name; udev can assign any number
> ???Net devices: kernel assigns a single name; udev can override it
>
> 4. Default name assignment policy
> Disks: names disk by device path (id), label and UUID
> ???Net devices: assigns arbitrary stable names per (MAC address, subtype)
>
> 5. Naming by users
> Disks: user can identify by any method without having to choose on a
> system-wide basis
> Net devices: user must identify by single name; policy can be overridden
> on a system-wide basis
>
> I fully understand the technical reasons for differences 3-5, but why
> should users have to put up with it?
That is because network devices are not referred to by /dev/ nodes where
multiple symlinks would solve the naming problem.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists