netdev - RE: [PATCH v2 4/7] fsl_pq_mdio: Add Suport for etsec2.0 devices.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9F4C7D19E8361D4C94921B95BE08B81B950352@zin33exm22.fsl.freescale.net>
Date:	Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:02:44 +0530
From:	"Kumar Gopalpet-B05799" <B05799@...escale.com>
To:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 4/7] fsl_pq_mdio: Add Suport for etsec2.0 devices.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net] 
>Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:13 PM
>To: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
>Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] fsl_pq_mdio: Add Suport for 
>etsec2.0 devices.
>
>From: Sandeep Gopalpet <sandeep.kumar@...escale.com>
>Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:25:18 +0530
>
>> This patch adds mdio support for etsec2.0 devices.
>> 
>> Modified the fsl_pq_mdio structure to include the new mdio members.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Gopalpet <sandeep.kumar@...escale.com>
>
>This is the third time you've submitted this patch, and for 
>the third time it DOES NOT apply to net-next-2.6 at all when I 
>try to apply this gianfar patch series.
>
>You must be patching against another tree that has some 
>changes that conflict with this one.
>
>Sort this out before submitting this again.
>
>If you submit once more this same series, and it doesn't apply 
>properly to net-next-2.6, I will flat our ignore your 
>submissions for a week or so.
>
>You are wasting that much of my time by doing this over and over.
>
>Get your act together.
>
>

Hi All,

I couldn't find the following commit on the net-next-2.6 tree:

commit e72701acbe0b35e52d3f04d442837c06b4e64f1c
Author: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Date:   Wed Oct 14 14:54:52 2009 -0700

    net: Fix OF platform drivers coldplug/hotplug when compiled as
modules

    Some OF platform drivers are missing module device tables, so they
won't
    load automatically on boot. This patch fixes the issue by adding
proper
    MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() macros to the drivers.

    Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

The same commit is present on the linux-next tree

I cloned the 2 trees from the following links:
linux-next from:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git/

And net-next-2.6 from:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git

The absence of the above mentioned commit in the net-next-2.6 tree is
causing
some issues with patches getting applied.

Can you let me know if the net-next-2.6 tree that I am cloning is the
proper one ?

I based all my patches on net-next-2.6 tree cloned from the above link.
But some how when David tries to apply
my patches they fail. I took a diff at the linux-next and net-next-2.6
and the said commit is missing.

-Thanks
Sandeep 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html