[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091029.060239.202729106.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bernhard.kaindl@....net
Cc: bruce.w.allan@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Regression: e100_phy_init() isolates even selected
PHY, causes 10 seconds boot delay
From: Bernhard Kaindl <bernhard.kaindl@....net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:33:31 +0200
> The current e100.c:e100_phy_init() electrically isolates all
> the PHYs (even the selected PHY -- for a short time!) from the MII.
>
> This happens only for a short duration before the isolation
> of the selected PHY is reverted, but it's enough to cause a
> major disturbance in the startup of our e100-based cards:
>
> On a number of Embedded/Industry Pentium boards which are in use,
> the result is that the initial DHCP negotiation takes more
> than 10 seconds to complete with 2.6.30 and .31, while it's
> done in a fraction of a second with 2.6.29 and earlier
> (kernels tested with no delay range from 2.6.23 to 2.6.29)
>
> That regression was introduced on March 31 in the by a patch
> from Bruce which first appeared in 2.6.30-rc3:
Bruce, can you give some feedback on this? I'd like to see this issue
move forward.
The only reason I haven't applied Bernhard's patch is because I
haven't seen any feedback from Intel. But I will apply it anyways if
I don't see reasonable feedback soon.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists