| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4AEC015D.80601@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:20:29 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: francis.moro@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct
David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:03:53 +0100
>
>> [PATCH take2] net: fix sk_forward_alloc corruption
>>
>> On UDP sockets, we must call skb_free_datagram() with socket locked,
>> or risk sk_forward_alloc corruption. This requirement is not respected
>> in SUNRPC.
>>
>> Add a convenient helper, skb_free_datagram_locked() and use it in SUNRPC
>>
>> Reported-by: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>
> I've tentatively applied this to my net-2.6 tree, I won't
> push it out until we have positive testing results.
I tested nfs/nfsd with fillowing additional debugging patch.
Without the fix (net: fix sk_forward_alloc corruption), I got warnings,
while with fix applied, I got no warnings. Its probably hard to hit
original bug since its a very small race window.
Trace without fix :
[ 226.686788] RPC: Registered udp transport module.
[ 226.686791] RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
[ 226.686792] RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 backchannel transport module.
[ 226.851677] Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 okir@...ad.swb.de).
[ 226.869381] NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the NFSv4 state recovery directory
[ 226.869443] NFSD: unable to find recovery directory /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery
[ 226.869488] NFSD: starting 90-second grace period
[ 226.870564] svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97).
[ 244.401237] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 244.401288] WARNING: at include/net/sock.h:886 sock_rfree+0x54/0x70()
[ 244.401334] Hardware name: ProLiant BL460c G1
[ 244.401379] Modules linked in: nfsd lockd auth_rpcgss sunrpc exportfs bonding ipv6
[ 244.401699] Pid: 5295, comm: nfsd Not tainted 2.6.32-rc3-00920-gbdd6be3-dirty #342
[ 244.401745] Call Trace:
[ 244.401784] [<c055355a>] ? printk+0x1d/0x23
[ 244.401827] [<c023c3f2>] warn_slowpath_common+0x72/0xa0
[ 244.401869] [<c04b0d54>] ? sock_rfree+0x54/0x70
[ 244.401909] [<c04b0d54>] ? sock_rfree+0x54/0x70
[ 244.401950] [<c023c43a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[ 244.401991] [<c04b0d54>] sock_rfree+0x54/0x70
[ 244.402033] [<c04b4cf5>] skb_release_head_state+0x45/0xe0
[ 244.402084] [<c04b49f0>] __kfree_skb+0x10/0x90
[ 244.402125] [<c04b4a8c>] consume_skb+0x1c/0x40
[ 244.402166] [<c04b7c62>] skb_free_datagram+0x12/0x70
[ 244.402217] [<fc9fa177>] svc_release_skb+0x37/0x60 [sunrpc]
[ 244.402261] [<c026f452>] ? module_put+0x62/0xf0
[ 244.402308] [<fca05c98>] svc_send+0x28/0xc0 [sunrpc]
[ 244.402356] [<fc9f8acb>] svc_process+0x22b/0x770 [sunrpc]
[ 244.402416] [<fd04895c>] nfsd+0xac/0x140 [nfsd]
[ 244.402484] [<fd0488b0>] ? nfsd+0x0/0x140 [nfsd]
[ 244.402543] [<c0257ab4>] kthread+0x74/0x80
[ 244.402602] [<c0257a40>] ? kthread+0x0/0x80
[ 244.402656] [<c020390f>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
[ 244.402711] ---[ end trace e202cdb1b491aa15 ]---
Debugging patch :
Intent is to make sure sock is locked by user or by softirq handler,
unless we are currently dismantling socket (sk_refcnt==0)
To speedup this test, we could use several bits of sk_lock.owned instead
of one for the user case.
(one for lock owned by user, one for lowk owned by softirq, one in dismantle phase)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 55de3bd..08ecb0e 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -849,10 +849,15 @@ static inline int sk_rmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int size)
__sk_mem_schedule(sk, size, SK_MEM_RECV);
}
+#define sock_owned_by_user(sk) ((sk)->sk_lock.owned)
+#define sock_owned(sk) ((sk)->sk_lock.owned || \
+ spin_is_locked(&(sk)->sk_lock.slock))
+
static inline void sk_mem_reclaim(struct sock *sk)
{
if (!sk_has_account(sk))
return;
+ WARN_ON(!(sock_owned(sk) || atomic_read(&sk->sk_refcnt) == 0));
if (sk->sk_forward_alloc >= SK_MEM_QUANTUM)
__sk_mem_reclaim(sk);
}
@@ -861,6 +866,7 @@ static inline void sk_mem_reclaim_partial(struct sock *sk)
{
if (!sk_has_account(sk))
return;
+ WARN_ON(!(sock_owned(sk) || atomic_read(&sk->sk_refcnt) == 0));
if (sk->sk_forward_alloc > SK_MEM_QUANTUM)
__sk_mem_reclaim(sk);
}
@@ -869,6 +875,7 @@ static inline void sk_mem_charge(struct sock *sk, int size)
{
if (!sk_has_account(sk))
return;
+ WARN_ON(!sock_owned(sk));
sk->sk_forward_alloc -= size;
}
@@ -876,6 +883,7 @@ static inline void sk_mem_uncharge(struct sock *sk, int size)
{
if (!sk_has_account(sk))
return;
+ WARN_ON(!sock_owned(sk));
sk->sk_forward_alloc += size;
}
@@ -900,7 +908,6 @@ static inline void sk_wmem_free_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
* Since ~2.3.5 it is also exclusive sleep lock serializing
* accesses from user process context.
*/
-#define sock_owned_by_user(sk) ((sk)->sk_lock.owned)
/*
* Macro so as to not evaluate some arguments when
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists