[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AEE35D2.4000503@miraclelinux.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:28:50 +0900
From: Naohiro Ooiwa <nooiwa@...aclelinux.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000: the power down when running ifdown command
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:39:52 +0900
> Naohiro Ooiwa <nooiwa@...aclelinux.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> I resend my patch.
>> Sorry, my previous mail lacked an explanation.
>>
>>
>> The e1000 driver doesn't let the power down when running ifdown command.
>> So, I set to the D3hot state of a PCI device at the end of e1000_close().
>>
>> With this modification, e1000 driver reduces power by ifdown.
>> It's about 6 watts when I measured a total power of one server machine
>> in my environment.
>>
>> I tested this patch. The result is good enough to me.
>>
>> Could you please check my patch ?
>> If I should have other considerations, please tell me.
>>
Hi Stephen
Thank you so much for your reply.
> Does this work with Wake On Lan?
Yes, it works WOL.
But I worry that my test is enough.
They are following:
- simple data transmission after ifdown;ifup.
- enable wol, ifup network device, system shutdown, and make sure wol work.
- enable wol, ifdown network device, system shutdown, and make sure wol work.
- while [ 0 ] ; do ifdown eth0 ; ifup eth0 ; done
- while [ 0 ] ; do modprobe e1000 ; rmmod e1000 ; done
> @@ -1265,6 +1287,7 @@ static int e1000_open(struct net_device *netdev)
> goto err_setup_rx;
>
> e1000_power_up_phy(adapter);
> + e1000_reset(adapter);
>
> adapter->mng_vlan_id = E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE;
> if ((hw->mng_cookie.status &
This code fix problem that e1000 driver doesn't work to auto-negotiation
once in a while.
Maybe, the cause is that set state to D0 just before it.
I found it by repeat of ifup and ifdown.
If you find out other points and any necessary tests from my patch,
please tell me. I will make sure them.
Thanks you.
Naohiro Ooiwa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists