[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091103200155.GQ8227@kvack.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:01:56 -0500
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...et.ca>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...acom.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs directory scaling: rbtree for dirent name lookups
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 07:50:58PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 11:31:30AM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> > Use an rbtree in sysfs_dirent to speed up file lookup times
> >
> > Systems with large numbers (tens of thousands and more) of network
> > interfaces stress the sysfs code in ways that make the linear search for
> > a name match take far too long. Avoid this by using an rbtree.
>
> What kind of speedups are you seeing here? And do these changes cause a
> memory increase due to the structure changes which outweigh the
> speedups?
Depends on the number of interfaces being created. Without the patch,
interface creation time tends to double or worse for every 5,000-10,000
additional network interfaces.
> What kind of test are you doing to reproduce this?
I'm creating 30,000+ network interfaces, with the goal being 100,000.
With other hacks in the tree to get around the sysctl and procfs scaling
issues, as well as disabling things like NetworkManager, the results look
as follows:
Interfaces no-rb rbtree rbtree+list
0-5,000 13.8s 14.0s 13.0s
5,000-10,000 20.0s 17.4s 14.4s
10,000-15,000 27.3s 24.1s 16.9s
15,000-20,000 36.3s 32.2s 19.7s
20,000-25,000 45.2s 40.0s 22.9s
25,000-30,000 54.2s 48.2s 26.6s
30,000-35,000 63.9s 54.9s 30.7s
Thoughts?
-ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists