netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v4 3/3] TCPCT part 1c: initial SYN exchange with SYNACK data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:14:29 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	william.allen.simpson@...il.com
Cc:	joe@...ches.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v4 3/3] TCPCT part 1c: initial SYN
 exchange with SYNACK data

From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:15:17 -0500

> If somebody else submitted a patch to change all the rest, I'd be
> content to follow along.

That's not how things work.

You cannot put a requirement that the rules are followed everywhere
perfectly in existing code before you're willing to follow them.
Nothing is special about you or your work.

You're being very unreasonable on several fronts especially with your
seeming unwillingness to follow our procedures, coding style, and
rules.  Actually, you seem to be willing to follow it, sometimes,
when it suits and doesn't inconvenience you.

And this behavior is starting to rub people the wrong way.  People
less and less want to review your work, and I want to make sure
you are shown exactly why that is happening.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html