netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14427] New: ipv6 forward cause strange route

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091102223237.c0102f19.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:32:37 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, green@....ru
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14427] New: ipv6 forward cause strange route


(switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).

On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:42:01 GMT bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:

> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14427
> 
>            Summary: ipv6 forward cause strange route
>            Product: Networking
>            Version: 2.5
>           Platform: All
>         OS/Version: Linux
>               Tree: Mainline
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P1
>          Component: IPV6
>         AssignedTo: yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
>         ReportedBy: green@....ru
>         Regression: No
> 
> 
> When enabling forwarding for IPv6 on interface, in the routing table local
> appears new route. It like route to local ip but with all host bits set to 0.
> Example:
> --------------------------------------------------
>   # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth0/forwarding
>   0
>   # ip -6 addr add 2001:db8:1:1::5/64 dev eth0
>   # ip -6 route show table local
>   ...
>   local 2001:db8:1:1::5 via :: dev lo  proto none  metric 0  mtu 16436 advmss
> 16376 hoplimit 4294967295
>   ...
>   # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth0/forwarding 
>   # ip -6 route show table local
>   ...
>   local 2001:db8:1:1:: via :: dev lo  proto none  metric 0  mtu 16436 advmss
> 16376 hoplimit 4294967295
>   local 2001:db8:1:1::5 via :: dev lo  proto none  metric 0  mtu 16436 advmss
> 16376 hoplimit 4294967295
>   ...
> --------------------------------------------------
> After enabling forwarding, route "2001:db8:1:1:: via :: dev lo" is added. No
> matter, forwarding is enabled before or after adding of address, this route is
> "on" with forwarding and "off" without it.
> Such behavior causes problems with /127 network masks. For example:
> --------------------------------------------------
>   # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth0/forwarding 
>   # ip -6 addr add 2001:db8:1:1::5/127 dev eth0
>   # ip -6 route add default via 2001:db8:1:1::4
>   RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
> --------------------------------------------------
> But if we disable forwarding (and strange route) when adding needed route, we
> will succeed.
> --------------------------------------------------
>   # echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth0/forwarding 
>   # ip -6 route add default via 2001:db8:1:1::4
>   # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/eth0/forwarding 
> --------------------------------------------------
> Default route remains in the table after enabling forwarding and it is doing in
> work. But in this case we still can not access 2001:db8:1:1::4, because it is
> routed to loopback:
> --------------------------------------------------
>   # ping6 -c 1 2001:db8:1:1::4
>   PING 2001:db8:1:1::4(2001:db8:1:1::4) 56 data bytes
>   64 bytes from 2001:db8:1:1::5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.114 ms
> --------------------------------------------------
> We get reply from self interface.
> 
> This was tested on x86 and x86_64 with 2.6.30 kernel and some previous versions
> on ArchLinux (2.6.30 x86 and x86_64), Ubuntu (2.6.28-15-generic x86_64) and
> gentoo (2.6.30-gentoo-r5 x86_64).
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html