netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: Support specifying the network namespace upon device creation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AEFFE32.4050808@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:56:02 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Support specifying the network namespace upon device
 creation.

Eric W. Biederman a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> writes:
>> Very nice, with only one long line you could wrap differently.
> 
> Say again?  Was that very nice with respect to the rest of the patch?
> Or sarcasm because I overlooked this wrap at 80 columns
> opportunity in ipgre?
> 
> Eric
>>   
>>> -static int ipgre_newlink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>> +static int ipgre_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *tb[],
>>>  			 struct nlattr *data[])
>>>  {
>>>  	struct ip_tunnel *nt;

Hmm, I am very sorry you take it as a sarcasm, I would not treat you or anyone like that.

I was basically Acking your patch, with only one minor note about one line becoming a bit long.

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>

It would be better to write :

static int ipgre_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
  			 struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html