netdev - Re: HTB accuracy on 10GbE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:54:13 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@...telecom.ru>
Cc:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: HTB accuracy on 10GbE

On 03-11-2009 11:13, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote:
>> Really?! As a matter of fact there isn't fully used the last change,
>> especially this part:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=124453482324409&w=2
>>
>> And nobody even noticed it for quite a long time. I'm not even sure
>> Ryousei needs this now for anything but comparing with some better
>> tool...
> 
> These changes have not been tested and applied to kernel?
> 
> As I now remember, I promised to test this patch and judging by 
> correspondence so it and have not made. My error - I am ready to
> correct it. Probably there were difficulties, and is then banal 
> has forgotten.
> It is possible to receive once again full ???°N~?N~?N~???N~? for the test?

There were a few iproute changes, tested enough I guess. Alas, I
didn't keep them (they could be found around with link above).

But it's not about your testing. I meant: since nobody noticed
something was (still) wrong with 1G scheduling, why bother with 10G?

Best regards,
Jarek P.

PS: ...and don't remove me from CC, please ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html