[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AF1D2DE.10705@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:15:42 -0500
From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, s.hetze@...ux-ag.com,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/3] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 11:02:15AM -0500, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> Ok, I think I've addressed all comments so far here.
>>> Rusty, I'd like this to go into linux-next, through your tree, and
>>> hopefully 2.6.33. What do you think?
>> I think the benchmark data is a prerequisite for merge consideration, IMO.
>
> Shirley Ma was kind enough to send me some measurement results showing
> how kernel level acceleration helps speed up you can find them here:
> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/VhostNet
Thanks for the pointers. I will roll your latest v8 code into our test
matrix. What kernel/qemu trees do they apply to?
-Greg
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (268 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists