[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AF1660E.1080401@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:31:26 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ryousei Takano <ryousei@...il.com>
CC: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
takano-ryousei@...t.go.jp
Subject: Re: HTB accuracy on 10GbE
Ryousei Takano a écrit :
>
> I tried iperf with 60 seconds samples. I got the almost same result.
>
> Here is the result:
> sender receiver
> 1.000 1.00 1.00
> 2.000 2.01 2.01
> 3.000 3.03 3.02
> 4.000 4.07 4.07
> 5.000 5.05 5.05
> 6.000 6.16 6.16
> 7.000 7.22 7.22
> 8.000 8.15 8.15
> 9.000 9.23 9.23
> 9.900 9.69 9.69
>
One thing to consider is the estimation error in qdisc_l2t(), rate table has only 256 slots
static inline u32 qdisc_l2t(struct qdisc_rate_table* rtab, unsigned int pktlen)
{
int slot = pktlen + rtab->rate.cell_align + rtab->rate.overhead;
if (slot < 0)
slot = 0;
slot >>= rtab->rate.cell_log;
if (slot > 255)
return (rtab->data[255]*(slot >> 8) + rtab->data[slot & 0xFF]);
return rtab->data[slot];
}
Maybe you can try changing class mtu to 40000 instead of 9000, and quantum to 60000 too
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate ${rate}mbit mtu 40000 quantum 60000
(because your tcp stack sends large buffers ( ~ 60000 bytes) as your NIC can offload tcp segmentation)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists