[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091104133728.GN31511@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:37:28 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 3/3] vhost_net: a kernel-level virtio server
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 03:17:36PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 02:15:33PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 03:08:28PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 01:59:57PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > Fine?
> > > >
> > > > I cannot say -- are there paths that could drop the device beforehand?
> > >
> > > Do you mean drop the mm reference?
> >
> > No the reference to the device, which owns the mm for you.
>
> The device is created when file is open and destroyed
> when file is closed. So I think the fs code handles the
> reference counting for me: it won't call file cleanup
> callback while some userspace process has the file open.
> Right?
Yes.
But the semantics when someone inherits such a fd through exec
or through file descriptor passing would be surely "interesting"
You would still do IO on the old VM.
I guess it would be a good way to confuse memory accounting schemes
or administrators @)
It would be all saner if this was all a single atomic step.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists