[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091105175316.GA27099@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:53:16 +0300
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: Jon Loeliger <jdl@....com>
Cc: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 <B05799@...escale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Fleming Andy-AFLEMING <afleming@...escale.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Do not call skb recycling with disabled
IRQs
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:40:21AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote:
[...]
> > >+ netif_tx_lock_bh(priv->ndev);
> >
> > Will this not lead to locking all the tx queues even though at this
> > point we are working on a "particular queue" ?
>
> Similar but different question: What version is this patch based upon?
> I can't find:
>
> > >index 197b358..a0ae604 100644
>
> My search of 2.6.31 up through current linux head (v2.6.32-rc6-26-g91d3f9b)
> and benh's current head (94a8d5caba74211ec76dac80fc6e2d5c391530df) do not
> have a version of this code with separate txqueues.
>
> I confess I'm not too familiar with the history here, so I don't know
> if that feature is in flux, or came, or went, or what.
Sorry for not mentioning, it's based on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git
+ compiler/sparse warnings fixes that I sent yesterday.
> That boils down to: I can't directly apply your patch, but I could
> hand-fudge its intent, but only on a single tx queue variant.
Here is the patch on top of the Linus' git tree, if you haven't
already 'back-ported' the previous patch.
diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
index 5bf31f1..5dca99c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gianfar.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
@@ -1274,7 +1274,6 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
u32 lstatus;
int i;
u32 bufaddr;
- unsigned long flags;
unsigned int nr_frags, length;
base = priv->tx_bd_base;
@@ -1298,14 +1297,11 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
/* total number of fragments in the SKB */
nr_frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->txlock, flags);
-
/* check if there is space to queue this packet */
if ((nr_frags+1) > priv->num_txbdfree) {
/* no space, stop the queue */
netif_stop_queue(dev);
dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->txlock, flags);
return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
}
@@ -1403,9 +1399,6 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
/* Tell the DMA to go go go */
gfar_write(&priv->regs->tstat, TSTAT_CLEAR_THALT);
- /* Unlock priv */
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->txlock, flags);
-
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
@@ -1915,17 +1908,14 @@ static int gfar_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
struct net_device *dev = priv->ndev;
int tx_cleaned = 0;
int rx_cleaned = 0;
- unsigned long flags;
/* Clear IEVENT, so interrupts aren't called again
* because of the packets that have already arrived */
gfar_write(&priv->regs->ievent, IEVENT_RTX_MASK);
- /* If we fail to get the lock, don't bother with the TX BDs */
- if (spin_trylock_irqsave(&priv->txlock, flags)) {
- tx_cleaned = gfar_clean_tx_ring(dev);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->txlock, flags);
- }
+ netif_tx_lock_bh(priv->ndev);
+ tx_cleaned = gfar_clean_tx_ring(dev);
+ netif_tx_unlock_bh(priv->ndev);
rx_cleaned = gfar_clean_rx_ring(dev, budget);
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists