[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AF32B25.4000700@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:44:37 -0500
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Linux Kernel Developers <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH RFC] TCPCT part 1d: generate Responder Cookie
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> William Allen Simpson a écrit :
>> As you suggest, I'll use the _bh suffix everywhere until every i is dotted
>> and t is crossed. Then, check for efficiency later after thorough
>> analysis by experts such as yourself.
>>
>> This code will be hit on every SYN and SYNACK that has a cookie option.
>> But it's just prior to a CPU intensive sha_transform -- in comparison,
>> it's trivial.
>>
> I think you misunderstood my advice ;)
>
Yes, I misunderstood, but it's clear now. As I have to re-spin the whole
kit and kaboodle after the recent net-next crashing bug fixes, I'll post
another complete set tomorrow to the net list.
Thanks again (for all messages).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists