netdev - Re: HTB accuracy on 10GbE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b30d1c3b0911050215q5f1065b2sf7bc82ff6709e810@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:15:30 +0900
From:	Ryousei Takano <ryousei@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	takano-ryousei@...t.go.jp
Subject: Re: HTB accuracy on 10GbE

Hi Eric,

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Ryousei Takano a écrit :
>> In my experiment, it is not very big problem.  I do not send short packets.
>> I got the almost same result in the both cases "mtu 64000" and "mtu
>> 40000 quantum 60000".
>>
>> Anyway, setting larger mtu size than the physical mtu does not quiet make sense.
>>
>
> tc class mtu is a hint given to stack, about average packet size, ie not
> related to physical MTU (because of TSO)
>
> You could use same mtu, but disable tso on device
>
I got it.
Thanks for your explanation.

Best regards,
Ryousei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html