netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Make polling safe with IRQs disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1N63WM-0003xK-PN@jdl.com>
Date:	Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:41:06 -0600
From:	Jon Loeliger <jdl@....com>
To:	avorontsov@...mvista.com
cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Make polling safe with IRQs disabled 

> 
> Hm, then I'd better remove the #ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL.
> 
> Interestingly though, why conn_track does the polling with irqs
> disabled, could be a bug in the conn_track? Because pretty much
> drivers assume that polling is called with IRQs enabled.
> 
> If it's easily reproducible, could you replace the printk() with
> WARN_ON(1) and post the backtrace? Or I can try to reproduce the
> issue if you tell me how.
> 
> Thanks!

Yeah, I can reproduce it.  I'll try and get that for you.

jdl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html