[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091105173409.GA24801@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:34:09 +0300
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 <B05799@...escale.com>
Cc: Jon Loeliger <jdl@....com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Fleming Andy-AFLEMING <afleming@...escale.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Do not call skb recycling with disabled
IRQs
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:53:08PM +0530, Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 wrote:
[...]
> >(spin_trylock_irqsave(&tx_queue->txlock, flags)) {
> >- tx_cleaned +=
> >gfar_clean_tx_ring(tx_queue);
> >-
> >spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx_queue->txlock,
> >- flags);
> >- }
> >+ netif_tx_lock_bh(priv->ndev);
>
> Will this not lead to locking all the tx queues even though at this
> point we are working on a "particular queue" ?
Yeah, per-txq locking would be better (or not.. I need to netperf
it).
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists