[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1257521204.29454.31.camel@johannes.local>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:26:44 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [RFC] netlink: add socket destruction notification
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 16:21 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
> > When we want to keep track of resources associated with applications, we
> > need to know when an app is going away. Add a notification function to
> > netlink that tells us that, and also hook it up to generic netlink so
> > generic netlink can notify the families. Due to the way generic netlink
> > works though, we need to notify all families and they have to sort out
> > whatever resources some commands associated with the socket themselves.
> This seems pretty similar to the NETLINK_URELEASE notifier invoked
> in netlink_release(). Wouldn't that one work as well?
Hmm, it does seem similar, thanks for pointing it out. What exactly does
the condition
if (nlk->pid && !nlk->subscriptions) {
mean though?
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists