netdev - Re: [PATCH] iproute2: ip route flush bugfix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AF87A8C.9090302@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:24:44 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Sven Anders <sven@...uras.de>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iproute2: ip route flush bugfix

Sven Anders a écrit :
> Hello!
> 
> I experienced an error, if I try to perform a
> 
>   ip route flush proto 4
> 
> with many routes in a complex environment, it
> gave me the following error:
> 
>   Failed to send flush request: Success
>   Flush terminated
> 
> I'm using version 2.6.29.
> I check GIT, but there was only the "MSG_PEEK" fix.
> 
> I tracked it down to the rtnl_send_check() function
> in lib/libnetlink.c.
> 
> In this function there is the following for loop:
> 
>         for (h = (struct nlmsghdr *)resp; NLMSG_OK(h, status);
>              h = NLMSG_NEXT(h, status)) {
>                 if (h->nlmsg_type == NLMSG_ERROR) {
>                         struct nlmsgerr *err = (struct nlmsgerr*)NLMSG_DATA(h);
>                         if (h->nlmsg_len < NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct nlmsgerr)))
>                                 fprintf(stderr, "ERROR truncated\n");
>                         else
>                                 errno = -err->error;
> 		}
>                 return -1;
>         }
> 
> I think the "return -1;" should be inside the if statement.
> 
> I attached a patch for this. The first part of the patch is taken from
> one of the late git commits.
> 
> Please note me, if the fix is wrong...
> 
> 
> Regards
>  Sven
> 
> PS: This is a repost, because I neither received a confirmation nor a remark, that
>     the fix is wrong. Moreover the fix didn't make it in the GIT repository yet...
> 


Yes, I posted a similar patch yesterday :)

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/142908

Still waiting an ACK from Stephen

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html