[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AF9B449.6040708@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:43:21 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Christine Caulfield <christine.caulfield@...glemail.com>,
Hannes Eder <hannes@...neseder.net>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-decnet-users@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] decnet: use RCU to find network devices
Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> When showing device statistics use RCU rather than read_lock(&dev_base_lock)
> Compile tested only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
>
> --- a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c 2009-11-10 09:30:55.557376454 -0800
> +++ b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c 2009-11-10 09:40:03.847005394 -0800
> @@ -856,9 +856,7 @@ int dn_dev_bind_default(__le16 *addr)
> dev = dn_dev_get_default();
> last_chance:
> if (dev) {
> - read_lock(&dev_base_lock);
> rv = dn_dev_get_first(dev, addr);
> - read_unlock(&dev_base_lock);
> dev_put(dev);
> if (rv == 0 || dev == init_net.loopback_dev)
> return rv;
> @@ -1323,18 +1321,18 @@ static inline int is_dn_dev(struct net_d
I dont understand this part. Why previous locking can be avoided ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists