[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091110124231.66141a0f@hyperion.delvare>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:42:31 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the i2c tree
Hi Stephen, Ben,
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:37:57 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/sfc/sfe4001.c between commit
> 3f7c0648f727a6d5baf6117653e4001dc877b90b ("i2c: Prevent priority
> inversion on top of bus lock") from the i2c tree and commit
> c9597d4f89565b6562bd3026adbe6eac6c317f47 ("sfc: Merge sfe4001.c into
> falcon_boards.c") from the net tree.
>
> I have applied the following merge fixup patch (after removing
> drivers/net/sfc/sfe4001.c) and can carry it as necessary.
I've merged the new API to get and release the i2c_adapter mutex:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=afa08974fe80c198b8650f73ed8ab59135ca10d0
Ben, you can adjust your own patches to make use of this API instead of
accessing the i2c_adapter mutex directly. That way, you are no longer
dependent of implementation changes, and this should solve the conflict.
Stephen, you can then drop your fixup patch.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists