netdev - [PATCH] netfilter: Should xt_osf_remove_callback() return negative on errors?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:33:01 +0100
From:	Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: Should xt_osf_remove_callback() return negative
 on errors?

Return a negative error value

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
---
 net/netfilter/xt_osf.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

It seems strange that an error return can be positive or
negative, is this maybe required?

diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_osf.c b/net/netfilter/xt_osf.c
index 63e1905..4d1a41b 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_osf.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_osf.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int xt_osf_remove_callback(struct sock *ctnl, struct sk_buff *skb,
 {
 	struct xt_osf_user_finger *f;
 	struct xt_osf_finger *sf;
-	int err = ENOENT;
+	int err = -ENOENT;
 
 	if (!osf_attrs[OSF_ATTR_FINGER])
 		return -EINVAL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html