netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/atm: move all compat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:34:50 +0000
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/atm: move all compat_ioctl handling to atm/ioctl.c

On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 14:30 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> +struct atmif_sioc32 {
> +       compat_int_t    number;
> +       compat_int_t    length;
> +       compat_caddr_t  arg;
> +};
> +
> +struct atm_iobuf32 {
> +       compat_int_t    length;
> +       compat_caddr_t  buffer;
> +}; 

We already have compat_atmif_sioc and compat_atm_iobuf structures
defined -- do those need to be duplicated?

Other than that, it looks sane. I wish I'd noticed that we already had
half a COMPAT implementation when I added the new bits. Thanks.

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html