lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0911130644280.5285@melkinpaasi.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date:	Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:54:52 +0200 (EET)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
cc:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v6 1/7 RFC] TCPCT part 1a: add request_values
 parameter for sending SYNACK

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, William Allen Simpson wrote:

> Add optional function parameters associated with sending SYNACK.
> These parameters are not needed after sending SYNACK, and are not
> used for retransmission.  Avoids extending struct tcp_request_sock,
> and avoids allocating kernel memory.
> 
> Also affects DCCP as it uses common struct request_sock_ops,
> but this parameter is currently reserved for future use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: William.Allen.Simpson@...il.com
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/net/request_sock.h      |    8 +++++++-
>  include/net/tcp.h               |    3 ++-
>  net/dccp/ipv4.c                 |    5 +++--
>  net/dccp/ipv6.c                 |    5 +++--
>  net/dccp/minisocks.c            |    2 +-
>  net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c |    2 +-
>  net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c             |   19 +++++++++++--------
>  net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c        |    2 +-
>  net/ipv4/tcp_output.c           |    3 ++-
>  net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c             |   28 +++++++++++++---------------
>  10 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 

> diff --git a/include/net/request_sock.h b/include/net/request_sock.h
> index c719084..c9b50eb 100644
> --- a/include/net/request_sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/request_sock.h
> @@ -27,13 +27,19 @@ struct sk_buff;
>  struct dst_entry;
>  struct proto;
>  
> +/* empty to "strongly type" an otherwise void parameter.
> + */
> +struct request_values {
> +};
> +
>  struct request_sock_ops {
>  	int		family;
>  	int		obj_size;
>  	struct kmem_cache	*slab;
>  	char		*slab_name;
>  	int		(*rtx_syn_ack)(struct sock *sk,
> -				       struct request_sock *req);
> +				       struct request_sock *req,
> +				       struct request_values *rvp);
>  	void		(*send_ack)(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  				    struct request_sock *req);
>  	void		(*send_reset)(struct sock *sk,
> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
> index 325bfcf..ec183fd 100644
> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
> @@ -440,7 +440,8 @@ extern int			tcp_connect(struct sock *sk);
>  
>  extern struct sk_buff *		tcp_make_synack(struct sock *sk,
>  						struct dst_entry *dst,
> -						struct request_sock *req);
> +						struct request_sock *req,
> +						struct request_values *rvp);
>  
>  extern int			tcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags);
>  
> diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv4.c b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
> index 2423a08..efbcfdc 100644
> --- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
> @@ -477,7 +477,8 @@ static struct dst_entry* dccp_v4_route_skb(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
>  	return &rt->u.dst;
>  }
>  
> -static int dccp_v4_send_response(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req)
> +static int dccp_v4_send_response(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
> +				 struct request_values *rv_unused)
>  {
>  	int err = -1;
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
> @@ -626,7 +627,7 @@ int dccp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	dreq->dreq_iss	   = dccp_v4_init_sequence(skb);
>  	dreq->dreq_service = service;
>  
> -	if (dccp_v4_send_response(sk, req))
> +	if (dccp_v4_send_response(sk, req, NULL))
>  		goto drop_and_free;
>  
>  	inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT);
> diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv6.c b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
> index 50ea91a..6574215 100644
> --- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
> @@ -241,7 +241,8 @@ out:
>  }
>  
>  
> -static int dccp_v6_send_response(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req)
> +static int dccp_v6_send_response(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
> +				 struct request_values *rv_unused)
>  {
>  	struct inet6_request_sock *ireq6 = inet6_rsk(req);
>  	struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
> @@ -468,7 +469,7 @@ static int dccp_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	dreq->dreq_iss	   = dccp_v6_init_sequence(skb);
>  	dreq->dreq_service = service;
>  
> -	if (dccp_v6_send_response(sk, req))
> +	if (dccp_v6_send_response(sk, req, NULL))
>  		goto drop_and_free;
>  
>  	inet6_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT);
> diff --git a/net/dccp/minisocks.c b/net/dccp/minisocks.c
> index 5ca49ce..af226a0 100644
> --- a/net/dccp/minisocks.c
> +++ b/net/dccp/minisocks.c
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ struct sock *dccp_check_req(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  			 * counter (backoff, monitored by dccp_response_timer).
>  			 */
>  			req->retrans++;
> -			req->rsk_ops->rtx_syn_ack(sk, req);
> +			req->rsk_ops->rtx_syn_ack(sk, req, NULL);
>  		}
>  		/* Network Duplicate, discard packet */
>  		return NULL;
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> index 26fb50e..ad098d6 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ void inet_csk_reqsk_queue_prune(struct sock *parent,
>  					       &expire, &resend);
>  				if (!expire &&
>  				    (!resend ||
> -				     !req->rsk_ops->rtx_syn_ack(parent, req) ||
> +				     !req->rsk_ops->rtx_syn_ack(parent, req, NULL) ||
>  				     inet_rsk(req)->acked)) {
>  					unsigned long timeo;
>  
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> index cf7f208..094231b 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> @@ -742,8 +742,9 @@ static void tcp_v4_reqsk_send_ack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>   *	This still operates on a request_sock only, not on a big
>   *	socket.
>   */
> -static int __tcp_v4_send_synack(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
> -				struct dst_entry *dst)
> +static int __tcp_v4_send_synack(struct sock *sk, struct dst_entry *dst,
> +				struct request_sock *req,
> +				struct request_values *rvp)
>  {
>  	const struct inet_request_sock *ireq = inet_rsk(req);
>  	int err = -1;
> @@ -753,7 +754,7 @@ static int __tcp_v4_send_synack(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
>  	if (!dst && (dst = inet_csk_route_req(sk, req)) == NULL)
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	skb = tcp_make_synack(sk, dst, req);
> +	skb = tcp_make_synack(sk, dst, req, rvp);
>  
>  	if (skb) {
>  		struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
> @@ -774,9 +775,10 @@ static int __tcp_v4_send_synack(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -static int tcp_v4_send_synack(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req)
> +static int tcp_v4_send_synack(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
> +			      struct request_values *rvp)
>  {
> -	return __tcp_v4_send_synack(sk, req, NULL);
> +	return __tcp_v4_send_synack(sk, NULL, req, rvp);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1211,13 +1213,13 @@ static struct timewait_sock_ops tcp_timewait_sock_ops = {
>  
>  int tcp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> -	struct inet_request_sock *ireq;
>  	struct tcp_options_received tmp_opt;
>  	struct request_sock *req;
> +	struct inet_request_sock *ireq;
> +	struct dst_entry *dst = NULL;
>  	__be32 saddr = ip_hdr(skb)->saddr;
>  	__be32 daddr = ip_hdr(skb)->daddr;
>  	__u32 isn = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->when;
> -	struct dst_entry *dst = NULL;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES
>  	int want_cookie = 0;
>  #else
> @@ -1337,7 +1339,8 @@ int tcp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	}
>  	tcp_rsk(req)->snt_isn = isn;
>  
> -	if (__tcp_v4_send_synack(sk, req, dst) || want_cookie)
> +	if (__tcp_v4_send_synack(sk, dst, req, NULL)
> +	 || want_cookie)
>  		goto drop_and_free;
>  
>  	inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT);
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
> index 4be2228..7a42990 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
> @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  		 * Enforce "SYN-ACK" according to figure 8, figure 6
>  		 * of RFC793, fixed by RFC1122.
>  		 */
> -		req->rsk_ops->rtx_syn_ack(sk, req);
> +		req->rsk_ops->rtx_syn_ack(sk, req, NULL);
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index 616c686..1151cb8 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> @@ -2224,7 +2224,8 @@ int tcp_send_synack(struct sock *sk)
>  
>  /* Prepare a SYN-ACK. */
>  struct sk_buff *tcp_make_synack(struct sock *sk, struct dst_entry *dst,
> -				struct request_sock *req)
> +				struct request_sock *req,
> +				struct request_values *rvp)
>  {
>  	struct inet_request_sock *ireq = inet_rsk(req);
>  	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> index de70909..3e327bc 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> @@ -461,7 +461,8 @@ out:
>  }
>  
>  
> -static int tcp_v6_send_synack(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req)
> +static int tcp_v6_send_synack(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
> +			      struct request_values *rvp)
>  {
>  	struct inet6_request_sock *treq = inet6_rsk(req);
>  	struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
> @@ -499,7 +500,7 @@ static int tcp_v6_send_synack(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req)
>  	if ((err = xfrm_lookup(sock_net(sk), &dst, &fl, sk, 0)) < 0)
>  		goto done;
>  
> -	skb = tcp_make_synack(sk, dst, req);
> +	skb = tcp_make_synack(sk, dst, req, rvp);
>  	if (skb) {
>  		struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
>  
> @@ -1161,13 +1162,13 @@ static struct sock *tcp_v6_hnd_req(struct sock *sk,struct sk_buff *skb)
>   */
>  static int tcp_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> +	struct tcp_options_received tmp_opt;
> +	struct request_sock *req;
>  	struct inet6_request_sock *treq;
>  	struct ipv6_pinfo *np = inet6_sk(sk);
> -	struct tcp_options_received tmp_opt;
>  	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
> -	struct request_sock *req = NULL;
> -	__u32 isn = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->when;
>  	struct dst_entry *dst = __sk_dst_get(sk);
> +	__u32 isn = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->when;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES
>  	int want_cookie = 0;
>  #else
> @@ -1239,23 +1240,20 @@ static int tcp_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  
>  		isn = tcp_v6_init_sequence(skb);
>  	}
> -
>  	tcp_rsk(req)->snt_isn = isn;
>  
>  	security_inet_conn_request(sk, skb, req);
>  
> -	if (tcp_v6_send_synack(sk, req))
> -		goto drop;
> +	if (tcp_v6_send_synack(sk, req, NULL)
> +	 || want_cookie)

This fits to one line very well. There were other unnecessary line-breaks 
too (might have been in another patch than this).

However, in cases where you really would have to split lines in if 
statement. Please move || (or &&) to the end of the previous line and use 
matching indent level on the line below (in this example the text is 
matching already, so it is just about converting || into spaces here). 
...As was mentioned by somebody already earlier.

Splitting of 1-3 is quite ok, the rest haven't arrived yet.

> +		goto drop_and_free;
>  
> -	if (!want_cookie) {
> -		inet6_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT);
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> +	inet6_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT);
> +	return 0;
>  
> +drop_and_free:
> +	reqsk_free(req);
>  drop:
> -	if (req)
> -		reqsk_free(req);
> -
>  	return 0; /* don't send reset */
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.3.3
> 
-- 
 i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ