[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AFD0631.9020802@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:09:37 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: fast consecutive name allocation
Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
> No one has give a reasonable use case for this network device name
> explosion, what is the benchmark doing this nosense, and how do I
> get paid to do it...
>
> But I have to say no for another reason. You cause the kernel to choose
> a different name for the case where a device is deleted or renamed.
> The old code would find and fill the hole when a new device was added.
>
> Since this is a semantic ABI change, the kind that drives users nuts.
>
Yes, I see your point Stephen, but it would be trivial to skip already
used devices as well with litle change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists