netdev - Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: fast consecutive name allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AFE5A6C.2030301@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:21:16 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@...rsen.dk>
CC:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...et.ca>,
	Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: fast consecutive name allocation

Benny Amorsen a écrit :
> Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com> writes:
> 
>> Then maybe network devices aren't the right layering model. At some
>> point the paradigm has to be re-examined.
> 
> I'm not quite sure where this becomes a problem. We have 1185 network
> interfaces (VLAN's) on one box. Boot time is a problem, but other than
> that it works ok. If something like this would help speed up booting,
> that would be very nice.
> 

It would be very nice if you tell us why booting is very long,
ie what is done and how much time it takes.

It's clear that ~1000 vlans is quite reasonable :)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html