[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1258046194.1931.18.camel@myhost>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:16:34 +0800
From: "Figo.zhang" <figo1802@...il.com>
To: zeal <zealcook@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ben@...tec.co.uk, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] KS8695: fix ks8695_rx() unreasonable action.
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 22:58 +0800, zeal wrote:
> From: zeal <zealcook@...il.com>
>
> ks8695_rx() will call refill_buffers() for every incoming packet.
> Its not necessary. We just need do it after finishing receiving thing.
> And the 'RX dma engine' is in the same situation.
> This blocks our user space application. The following patch may fix it.
>
yes, it is right.
Best,
Figo.zhang
> Signed-off-by: zeal <zealcook@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c b/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
> index e15451a..be256b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
> @@ -544,14 +544,13 @@ rx_finished:
> ksp->next_rx_desc_read =
> (last_rx_processed + 1) &
> MAX_RX_DESC_MASK;
> -
> - /* And refill the buffers */
> - ks8695_refill_rxbuffers(ksp);
> -
> - /* Kick the RX DMA engine, in case it became
> - * suspended */
> - ks8695_writereg(ksp, KS8695_DRSC, 0);
> }
> + /* And refill the buffers */
> + ks8695_refill_rxbuffers(ksp);
> +
> + /* Kick the RX DMA engine, in case it became
> + * suspended */
> + ks8695_writereg(ksp, KS8695_DRSC, 0);
> return received;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists