netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] act_mirred: optimization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091116132714.GA15056@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:27:14 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hadi@...erus.ca,
	shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] act_mirred: optimization

On 16-11-2009 14:05, Changli Gao wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:58 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:48:39 -0800 (PST)
>>
>>> From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:53:29 +0800
>>>
>>>> act_mirred: optimization.
>>>>
>>>> move checking if eaction is valid in tcf_mirred_init()
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>
>>> Also applied, thank you.
>> Nevermind, you're NOT TESTING the patches you are posting:
>>
>> net/sched/act_mirred.c: In function â??tcf_mirredâ??:
>> net/sched/act_mirred.c:168: error: label â??outâ?? used but not defined
>> net/sched/act_mirred.c:158: warning: unused variable â??errâ??
>> net/sched/act_mirred.c:158: warning: unused variable â??retvalâ??
>> make[2]: *** [net/sched/act_mirred.o] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [net/sched] Error 2
>> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>
>> I'm thus reverting both changes.
>>
>> Don't submit changes which are untested, it wastes my time.
>>
> 
> I am sorry about that. But I did test it before submitting these two,
> and I am just wondering if they are applied without any error. Would
> you post the file after being patched? I think it will be helpful to
> finger out the real problem.
> 
> BTW: since my email client thunderbird was broken, I used google
> webmail(with ViewSourceWith addon) to submit these two patches.
> 

It seems PATCH 1/2 might be broken by email (but I got it second hand
from gmail). checkpatch output:

ERROR: patch seems to be corrupt (line wrapped?)
#17: FILE: net/sched/act_mirred.c:147:
struct tc_action *a,

WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level
#34: FILE: net/sched/act_mirred.c:160:
+                       printk("tcf_mirred unknown action %d\n",

total: 1 errors, 1 warnings, 89 lines checked

mirred1.diff has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html