[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091117083541.69e1e403@nehalam>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:35:41 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Rasesh Mody <rmody@...cade.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Adapter Linux Open SRC Team"
<adapter_linux_open_src_team@...cade.COM>
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH 5/6] bna: Brocade 10Gb Ethernet device driver
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:32:45 -0800
Rasesh Mody <rmody@...cade.com> wrote:
> > +
> > +#define wwn_t u64
> > +#define lun_t u64
>
> "No need for obfuscation, at least use a typedef."
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> When using a typedef in place of #define for wwn_t we are getting check-patch warning. Is it advisable to use a typedef?
>
> - Rasesh
People disagree but my opinion on typedef's is they are ok as long as:
* a structure or integral type (ie not a pointer)
* encapsulates some semantic meaning (be32, spin_lock, irq_return)
* used in several places
* not just a data structure
The other option is just do a global replace.
What you were doing with #define is a weaker form of typedef. Which
is worse.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists