[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091118.115039.41419484.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:50:39 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc: peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
gospo@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/3] ixgbe: Set MSI-X vectors to
NOBALANCING and set affinity
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:46:10 +0000
> When forwarding between 2 ports it can be beneficial to match the
> affinity of each port's TX interrupts with the other port's RX
> interrupts. Obviously this is not the case when the system is
> acting as an endpoint, and the situation is presumably more complex
> when forwarding between >2 ports.
Yes, but tricks like that won't be necessary with changes that Eric
Dumazet said he'd work on soon, wherein SKB frees always get scheduled
to occur on the cpu where allocation occured.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists