[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pr7fbh5p.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:29:54 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>
To: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>
Cc: Sriramakrishnan <srk@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] TI Davinci EMAC : add platform specific interrupt enable/disable logic.
Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com> writes:
> Sriramakrishnan wrote:
>> On certain SOCs, the EMAC controller is interfaced with a wrapper logic
>> for handling interrupts. This patch implements a platform
>> specific hook to cater to platforms that require custom interrupt
>> handling logic
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sriramakrishnan <srk@...com>
>> Acked-by: Chaithrika U S <chaithrika@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/davinci_emac.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> include/linux/davinci_emac.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/davinci_emac.c b/drivers/net/davinci_emac.c
>> index 6aec8f5..81931f8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/davinci_emac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/davinci_emac.c
>> @@ -487,6 +487,9 @@ struct emac_priv {
>> struct mii_bus *mii_bus;
>> struct phy_device *phydev;
>> spinlock_t lock;
>> + /*platform specific members*/
>> + void (*wrapper_int_enable) (void);
>> + void (*wrapper_int_disable) (void);
>
> Would platform_int_enable be more appropriate then wrapper_int_enable ?
>
Or just int_enable. As it's being used through a private pointer,
it's clear that it's a wrapper.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists